• Unofficial team competition at the Olympic. Unofficial team competition

    13.10.2021

    The Olympic Games are not competitions of countries, but of athletes in individual or team sports.

    However, the figures of the unofficial team standings are actively used by various media outlets, representatives of national sports federations and National Olympic Committees, and other interested parties. This practice is used in many countries, and there is no single standard, the methodology can vary from country to country and change over time. For the first time, NKZ tables began to be published in relation to the results of the games of the IV Olympiad.

    History

    The conventionality of the unofficial team classification is recognized by all interested parties, but it is believed that it allows some conclusions to be drawn about the real situation in world sports.

    see also

    Notes (edit)


    Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

    See what "Unofficial Team Score" is in other dictionaries:

      Main article: 2010 Summer Youth Olympics Medal test at summer youth Olympic Games ah 2010 unofficial team standings of National Olympic Committees (NOCs) in the number of medals received by their athletes ... ... Wikipedia

      Main article: 2012 Winter Youth Olympics Medal standings at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympic Games unofficial team standings of National Olympic Committees (NOCs) for the number of medals received by their athletes in ... ... Wikipedia

      The following table shows the distribution of medals and points among the countries participating in the 1956 Winter Olympics, held in Cortina d Ampezzo, Italy from January 26 to February 5. Between 821 athletes from 32 countries were ... ... Wikipedia

      The following table shows the distribution of medals and points among the countries participating in the 1956 Winter Olympics, held in Cortina d Ampezzo, Italy from January 26 to February 5. Between 821 athletes from 32 countries there were ... ... Wikipedia - The 3rd Biathlon World Championship was held in Sweden, in Umeå in 1961. Contents 1 Individual race 20 km 2 Unofficial team competition ... Wikipedia

      The 4th Biathlon World Championship was held in Finland, in Hämenlinna in 1962. Contents 1 Individual 20 km race 2 Unofficial team competition ... Wikipedia

      This page requires significant revision. Perhaps it needs to be wikified, supplemented or rewritten. Explanation of the reasons and discussion on the Wikipedia page: For improvement / March 22, 2012. Date of staging for improvement March 22, 2012. 5th ... ... Wikipedia

    58 - Inner news page

    On Sunday, June 28, the first European Games ended in the capital of Azerbaijan. According to the results of the unofficial team classification of the tournament, the Russian team took first place with a great advantage.

    6:47 29.06.2015

    On Sunday, June 28, the first European Games ended in the capital of Azerbaijan. According to the results of the unofficial team classification of the tournament, the Russian team took first place with a great advantage. On the account of Russian athletes 164 medals - 79 gold, 40 silver and 45 bronze.
    On the second place is the team of the hosts of the tournament, on the third line is the team of Great Britain.

    2015 European Games in Baku. Medal credit

    A place Command Gold Silver Bronze Sum
    1 Russia 79 40 45 164
    2 Azerbaijan 21 15 20 56
    3 United Kingdom 18 10 19 47
    4 Germany 15 16 33 64
    5 Italy 10 25 10 45
    6 Belarus 10 11 22 43
    7 France 9 11 18 38
    8 Ukraine 8 14 23 45
    9 Netherlands 8 11 9 28
    10 Hungary 8 4 8 20
    11 Serbia 8 4 3 15
    12 Spain 7 11 11 29
    13 Switzerland 7 4 3 14
    14 Turkey 6 4 19 29
    15 Belgium 4 3 3 10
    16 Romania 3 5 4 12
    17 Portugal 3 4 2 9
    18 Poland 2 8 10 20
    19 Austria 2 7 4 13
    20 Georgia 2 5 8 15
    21 Israel 2 4 6 12
    22 Slovakia 2 2 3 7
    23 Lithuania 2 1 4 7
    24 Ireland 2 1 3 6
    25 Croatia 1 4 6 11
    26 Greece 1 4 4 9
    27 Bulgaria 1 3 5 9
    28 Sweden 1 3 3 7
    29 Denmark 1 2 5 8
    30 Slovenia 1 1 2 4
    31 Latvia 1 0 1 2
    32 Czech 0 2 4 6
    33-34 Moldavia 0 1 2 3
    33-34 Estonia 0 1 2 3
    35 San marino 0 1 1 2
    36-37 Armenia 0 1 0 1
    36-37 Cyprus 0 1 0 1
    38-39 Macedonia 0 0 2 2
    38-39 Norway 0 0 2 2
    40-42 Kosovo 0 0 1 1
    40-42 Montenegro 0 0 1 1
    40-42 Finland 0 0 1 1

    Officially, the International Olympic Committee treats the Games as a competition between athletes, not between countries. There is no general main panel of judges at the Games, which would summarize the results of the overall team championship... In the final materials stored in the archives of the IOC, only the results of the individual championship are given, and the team championship - only in the disciplines provided for as team competitions ( sport games, relay race, team races, etc.).

    However, journalists, sports statistics in the press, literature, reference books publish the results of the team championship in the unofficial standings.

    The publication of tables defining the outcome of the wrestling of countries has its own definite meaning. Even P. de Coubertin said that the team scoring at the Games objectively contributes to the further development of the Olympic movement, encourages states to develop sports, so as not to be at the end of even an unofficial table. The IOC does not accept this scoring, but in recent times the National Olympic Committees, and sometimes the Organizing Committee of the host country, also began to lead it.

    For the first time, an unofficial team competition appeared in 1908, at the IV Olympic Games. Then, for the 1st place taken by the athlete, 3 points were given, for the 2nd - 2 and for the 3rd - point. Since the VIII Games (1924), the number of athletes earning points has doubled - they began to evaluate the final sixes: 1st place brings 7 points, 2nd - 5, 3rd - 4, 4th - 3, 5th - 2, 6th - 1 point. Although in some countries other methods of calculation were used, in particular, 10 points were awarded for the 1st place, nevertheless, the rating system introduced more than half a century ago has survived to our time.

    This system of unofficial team classification, in our opinion, is biased. First, an equal number of points will be awarded for winning the individual competition and the team competition. The unequal number of program numbers in different sports leads to the fact that in some types of teams they receive more points than in others, where, even with high results, the maximum possible number of points is limited. So, in competitions athletics 42 numbers of the program, in swimming - 31. Successfully performing here teams can receive a significant number of points in these types, and teams - winners of football tournaments, basketball, volleyball, handball, hockey for the team's victory - only 7 points each. A small number of points are earned by competitions in some other types of the Olympic program.

    Sports organizations of our country are in favor of summing up the results of the team classification at the Games, even if only by journalists and statisticians. Recently, the press most often reported only the number of medals won. And here; Of course, there is also little objectivity: an award won by a team of football players, hockey players or basketball players as a result of a long intense tournament is equivalent to a medal of a runner, swimmer at the same distance or gymnast - on one of the apparatus.

    But so far there are no other evaluation criteria.

    The International Olympic Committee considers the Olympic Games as a competition between athletes, and not between countries, and therefore does not define a team championship. However, journalists, sports statisticians in the press, sports literature, and various reference books publish the results of the unofficial team championship.

    For the first time, an unofficial team competition appeared in 1908 at the IV Olympic Games. Then, for the first place taken by the athlete, 3 points were given, for the second - 2, for the third - 1. Since 1924, since the VIII Olympic Games, the evaluation system has changed significantly - they began to evaluate the final sixes: for the first place - 7 points, for the second - 5, for the third - 4, for the fourth - 3, for the fifth - 2 and for the sixth -1. In some countries, sometimes 10 points were given for the first place, and for the next five places - 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 point, respectively.

    In team events, points are awarded to the entire team, not to each athlete.

    The accepted system of unofficial team classification is generally biased, because in different sports there is an extremely unequal number of program numbers. So, at the last Olympiad, track and field competitions were held in 38 types, and, therefore, a total of 836 points were played in them; in swimming at 29 distances - 638 points. And in such sports as basketball, football, water polo, only 22 points are played; in volleyball, modern pentathlon - 44 points each. It turns out that the outcome of the team championship under such a system is decided by the results in athletics and swimming competitions.

    The sports organizations of our country are in favor of holding a team event at the Olympic Games, even if only by journalists and statisticians, but not in the form in which it exists today.

    Many sports experts make a proposal to hold an offset in each sport, and then, having determined the place of the country, summarize these data for the overall result of the Games.

    The achievement of an individual is his personal merit, but he also bears responsibility for a mistake. Therefore, success often breeds pride, and if you make a mistake, you feel like a complete failure. So remember the rule: one person only plays the game, the team wins and wins the championship. And if you want to realize your full potential or achieve the seemingly impossible, then you must stop thinking only of yourself and become a team player.

    Teamwork is the secret of success and all great business achievements. But at the same time, it is important to understand that simply reading this phrase and believing in this statement are two different things. Without well-established teamwork, your dental clinic will not begin to flourish and move forward, while a lot of time, energy and money will be spent on it. There will be no development simply because people who do not work as a well-coordinated mechanism are not able to fully realize their potential.

    My own game

    Why is teamwork so good? Firstly, it involves a certain number of people, which means that more resources, ideas and energy are involved than in the case when one person works. Secondly, in the team, the potential of the leader is revealed to the maximum extent and at the same time his shortcomings are smoothed out, the strengths and weaknesses of an individual person are more pronounced. Thirdly, the team has many options for understanding how to satisfy a need or achieve a goal set for the clinic. It is extremely rare that the ability of one employee to fully understand the problem can be compared with that of several specialists.

    Of course, teamwork and coordination of good practice is impossible without an experienced leader, but ideally, all team members have a good incentive to actively provide optimal solutions to a given problem.


    If you want to reach your potential or achieve the impossible, then you must become a team player. One person only plays the game, but the team wins
    Achievement or success is the merit of everyone on the team, and at the same time, everyone is responsible for the wrong decision. Thus, true modesty is brought up and a real team is formed. The achievement of an individual is his personal merit, but the responsibility for a mistake falls only on him. If successful, pride is generated, and otherwise, a feeling of complete failure. Working in a team, the leader is responsible for achieving goals. Being alone, a person is not connected with anyone and can change their goals without any accountability to others.

    In the end, a team can simply do a lot more than a single specialist, and the work will be done better and in greater volumes. Therefore, if you want to realize your full potential or achieve the seemingly impossible, then you simply have to become a team player. One person only plays the game, but it is the team that wins and conquers the championship.

    Teams can be different - family, group of friends, football club or clinic staff - but coordination and communication between participants remain key factors in their work. In an effective team, all players are in constant interaction. Communication increases the number of commitments and connections, which, in turn, are the driving force. Therefore, if you want your team to reach the highest level, its members must be able to talk to each other, listen to each other, as well as jointly resolve conflict situations and make decisions. The practice's success and the ability of its workers to work together depend on good communication in four areas. We'll talk about them below.

    From leader to team

    Communication should be the leader's main tool. If you don’t know how to communicate properly, you will not be able to effectively lead others. Leaders, consider these axioms to build good teamwork. Everyone at least occasionally takes on the role of a leader, regardless of their role in the clinic. These are important statements for each of us.

    Be persistent. No one disappoints team members like a leader who is unable to make decisions. Be clear about your tasks. Your team will not be able to complete any assignments if its members do not know what you want from them. Do not try to shine your mind in front of anyone. Instead, simply impress everyone with your honesty, focus, and clarity of thought.

    Be polite. Each person is worthy of respect, no matter what his position is or what kind of relationship you have with him. You will set the tone for the entire team with your politeness in dealing with employees. After all, as you know, a team is a mirror in which its leader is reflected. Communication is not a one-way process. A leader's communication style should not be dictatorial or top-down. A good leader listens, engages, and then encourages collaboration.

    From team to leader

    Good team leaders will never allow all of their questions to be answered in the affirmative. They want sincere and direct communication with employees. That is why you must always be one step ahead. Leaders do not want to hear: "I just wanted to tell you that this will not work."

    If you know anything ahead of time, it's time to share your ideas and questions and consider alternative plans. Be sincere, direct, and inquisitive, but not harsh, angry, or indifferent. Your leader will appreciate your interest. Also, do not forget about politeness. Leading a team is not easy. This requires hard work and personal sacrifice. Sometimes you have to make uncompromising, difficult and not always popular decisions. Team members must respect the person who has agreed to take on this role and show their loyalty to him. Just as you can feel that they do not know how you are doing in a given situation, just as you can not know for sure what is happening and how they are feeling. So, be interested and polite.

    In one team

    A few people are successful only if many other people are willing to see them that way. For a team to succeed, all team members must interact for the greater good by demonstrating:

    1. Support. Don't ask what your teammates can do for you, ask yourself what you can do for them. If communication is focused on giving, not taking, the team will very soon reach a qualitatively new level of work.
    2. Timeliness. Team members who only rephrase old problems and, simply put, constantly push water in a mortar, cannot work together to achieve the perfect result.
    3. Sensitivity. A team, as a small society, develops only when its members do not behave defiantly with each other.

    Communication as an art

    When it comes to patients, team members need to be receptive, responsive and realistic. If they behave politely, answer questions in a timely manner and correctly assess the expectations of the clinic's clients, then they will achieve high results. Patients feel very subtly when their problems are heard and referred to the right address, when they are treated with responsibility and appropriate care.

    Successful team communication is based on the “we” concept, not the “I” concept. Working together means winning together. No team will work right unless there is true communication between its members, fully expressed. It is worth noting that communication occurs when one communicant sends, and the other receives a clear and understandable message. You can send messages all day, but if the recipient does not receive them, then it becomes necessary to establish a new communication channel. Communication is an art. It is necessary in order to keep teamwork in good shape and to revitalize activities in general.

    Conclusion

    So the team is the heart of the dental practice. When the time, talent and potential of individuals are focused and focused on common goals, success and prosperity simply cannot be avoided. And you can create your own "dream team" that will work consistently, minimizing the chaos in your practice, organizing an efficient and effective work system, creating a favorable environment for development. He will also focus on team building through effective and subtle communication.

    We all sometimes think that the strength and power of teamwork has been researched for a long time, but when you really dive headlong into this topic, you understand that the team is the key that can open your potential. Listen, communicate and invest in the people around you. Then your practice will be successful.

  • The results of the team struggle of the Russian and USSR national artistic gymnastics team at the Summer Olympic Games since 1952. to 2004
  • How were the winners of the Olympic Games and other pan-Greek competitions awarded?
  • What is the economic program, organization and conduct of the Olympic Games?
  • The winners of the Olympic Games in the unofficial team event (NCT) are determined according to a special system for calculating the results of the performances of national teams, which is not recognized by the IOC as official. Since 1924, most countries have adhered to the following scoring system: 7 points for the first place, 5 for the second, 4 for the third, 3 for the fourth; 2 - for the fifth, 1 - for the sixth.

    Summer Olympic Games (NKZ) Winners

    1896: 1. Greece, 2. USA, 3. Germany

    1900: 1. France, 2. USA, 3. Great Britain

    1904: 1. USA, 2. Germany, 3. Cuba

    1908: 1. Great Britain, 2. USA, 3. Sweden

    1912: 1. Sweden, 2. USA, 3. Great Britain

    1920: 1. USA, 2. Sweden, 3. Great Britain

    1924: 1. USA, 2. France, 3. Finland

    1928: 1. USA, 2. Germany, 3. Sweden

    1932: 1. USA, 2. Italy, 3. Germany

    1936: 1. Germany, 2. USA, 3. Italy

    1948: 1. USA, 2. Sweden, 3. France

    1952: 1-2 USSR, USA, 3. Hungary

    1956: 1. USSR, 2. USA, 3. Australia

    1960: 1. USSR, 2. USA, 3. United Team of Germany (GDR-FRG)

    1964: 1. USSR, 2. USA, 3. United Team of Germany (GDR-FRG)

    1968: 1. USA, 2. USSR, 3. GDR

    1972: 1. USSR, 2. USA, 3. GDR

    1976: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. USA

    1980: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. Bulgaria

    1984: 1. USA, 2. Romania, 3. Germany

    1988: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. USA

    1992: 1. CIS, 2. USA, 3. Germany

    1996: 1. USA, 2. Germany, 3. Russia

    2000: 1. USA, 2. Russia, 3. China.

    2004: 1. USA, 2. China, 3. Russia.

    2008: 1. China, 2. USA, 3. Russia.

    Winter Olympic Games (NKZ) Winners

    1924: 1. Norway, 2. Finland, 3. USA

    1928: 1. Norway, 2. USA, 3. Sweden

    1932: 1. USA, 2. Norway, 3. Canada

    1936: 1. Norway, 2. Germany, 3. Sweden

    1948: 1. Sweden, 2. Switzerland, 3. USA

    1952: 1. Norway, 2. USA, 3. Finland

    1956: 1. USSR, 2. Austria, 3. Finland

    1960: 1. USSR, 2. USA, 3. Sweden

    1964: 1. USSR, 2. Norway, 3. Austria

    1966: 1. Norway, 2. USSR, 3. Austria

    1972: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. Norway

    1976: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. USA

    1980: 1. GDR, 2. USSR, 3. USA

    1984: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. USA

    1988: 1. USSR, 2. GDR, 3. Switzerland

    1992: 1. Germany, 2. CIS, 3. Norway

    1994: 1. Russia, 2. Norway, 3. Germany

    1998: 1. Germany, 2. Norway, 3. Russia.



    2002: 1. Norway, 2. Germany, 2. USA.

    2006: 1. Germany, 2. USA, 3. Austria.

    What are International Sports Federations (IFs)

    International Sports Federations are sports associations that manage and coordinate the work of regional and national sports organizations for sports.

    The prerequisites for the creation of IFs are: the presence of sports federations in individual states, an increase in the number of international competitions, lack of uniform rules, IOC requirements for registration Olympic species sports.

    Among the first IFs are the federations for gymnastics (1881), speed skating and rowing (1892). The youngest MSFs are associations in volleyball (1947), taekwondo (1966), karate-do (1970), acrobatics (1971).

    The IOC can recognize the IFs if the sport is cultivated on three continents in 25 countries - for men and 20 - for women (winter sports). For summer sports, it is imperative to spread them on four continents in 75 countries - for men and 40 - for women.

    A significant event was the unification of the IFs into the General Association. In 1967, it had 27 federations. Not all IFs, even those recognized by the IOC, have access to the Olympic Games. Therefore, the world organization ISF (AGFIS) annually holds alternative competitions - world games: in karate cultivated in 85 countries, squash (60); softball (55); roller skating (50) and many other sports.



    In addition to AGFIS, the Association of International Federations for Summer Sports (ASOIF), for Winter Sports (AIVF) and the Association of International Federations recognized by the IOC (ARISF) also stand out.

    A number of IFs such as chess, swimming, basketball, athletics, weightlifting, football, boxing, volleyball, wrestling, sailing, tennis, etc. have their own regional associations. International Federation football associations (FIFA) is represented by the European Union of Football Associations (UEFA), Asian, African, South American and some others.

    The structure of almost any sports federation can be distinguished: plenary, executive (administrative) and technical bodies. Plenary bodies (congresses, assemblies, conferences, etc.) occupy the top rung of the management ladder, making the most responsible decisions regarding the activities of IFs. Administrative bodies (president, executive committee) enjoy great powers in making managerial decisions, which essentially equates them with plenary ones. Technical - commissions, subcommissions perform auxiliary functions in various areas of the IFs' work.

    All IFs can be conditionally divided into: IFs that govern amateur and professional sports (football, tennis, cycling); IFs that manage amateur sports that have become widespread among professionals (basketball, rugby, hockey, boxing, baseball, figure skating); IFs that manage amateur sports only (swimming, water polo, table tennis and etc.).

    The functions of the IFS are reduced to: providing practical assistance to the NSF, popularizing their sport, assisting in the implementation of the goals set out in the Olympic Charter, organizing and conducting competitions, establishing records, changing the program and rules of the competition, providing assistance in the implementation of the Olympic Solidarity program.

    IFs influence the development of the sports movement in the world. The most important areas of their activities include: the inclusion of new sports in the program of the Olympic Games, the admission of professional athletes to amateur competitions, participation in new economic programs, regulation of the number of participants, changing the rules of competitions, and the fight against doping.

    Statutes, practice and activities of the IFs within Olympic Movement must comply with the Olympic Charter, in particular as regards the adoption and application of the World Anti-Doping Code. In light of the above, each IF maintains its independence and autonomy in the management of its sport.

    Similar articles